Don't Shit Me is trying to help people behave better so that we can all be less annoyed, a little consideration towards your wife, husband, kids, girlfriend, boyfriend, boss or staff can make a big difference!

Channel Seven Shit Me!

This post was written by Don on February 14, 2010
Posted Under: Sport,Television

It seems Channel 7 here in Australia are allowing Matthew Johns to head a TV show on their network. So now, not only do they have Mel and Koch in the morning, which is awful, they also don’t show Lost in a timely manner. But, I digress.

I wrote about Johns previously, and I think it’s disgraceful that Seven would bring him onto the TV barely a year after he admitted to being the leader of a gangbang in New Zealand.

And the head of Channel Seven seems to think it’s fine, he’s quoted here as saying they plan to promote the shit out of the show.

They should not have put that shit in the show in the first place.

Reader Comments

I agree with you ! I think Channel 7 are disgusting and Matthew Johns even more so. How dare they promote such an f…ing loser.. How dare they ? Matthew Johns is nothing more than a disgrace of a man and yet he gets his own show. Just shows that in this country all you have to do is be a football star and gang bang a few people and then you get your own TV show… Unbelievable..Channel 7 … you are a disgrace !

#1 
Written By Samantha on February 14th, 2010 @ 10:29 PM

Samantha,

Thanks, I hope C7 take a beating because of this distasteful decision, but I fear a lot of the NRL knuckleheads will think it’s just fine.

#2 
Written By Don on February 15th, 2010 @ 8:40 AM

Self righteous , self opinionated censorius, do-gooders shit me…
it was a case of CONSENUAL sex between legal age adults in a private setting. YOUR obvious adversion to that type of sexual activity is irrelevant.The female in question makes no claim to any inference that her actions were agaisnt her will. Only that now, a number of years later she “regrets” her actions. Mr Johns has also expressed his regrets on this matter. Have the do-godders demanded that all parties involved (including the female)be publicly identified and families and partners of such, notified of their past sexual activities…..the answer is a BIG FAT NO

#3 
Written By Anonymous on February 23rd, 2010 @ 8:11 AM

Your position is a reasonable one. I doubt though that the woman would have consented to being shagged by how ever many men it was and even if she did, given that one or more of them had girlfriends or wives, they should have had more respect for their partners, and the woman in question. Your comments on so many of the posts here are very welcome, thank you

#4 
Written By Don on February 23rd, 2010 @ 9:02 AM

On Ya Don,
You take opposing views to your own very gracefully. Not sure if that shits me…??? No .Just thought about it for a minute ….Nah I don’t think it shits me.
I’ll keep chucking in my 2 bobs worth on any subject I think warrants it. Never know ..if I comment on enough posts I may actually start to give enough people the shits to create a “Da mItH” shits me page.

#5 
Written By dAMith on February 24th, 2010 @ 10:19 AM

it was a case of CONSENUAL sex between legal age adults in a private setting

Let’s get it straight – she consented to having sex with two of them, not the rest (and the audience) that Johns and his team mate then called in. What was she supposed to do in that situation? Johns should have known better. I’m just glad (in this case) that Prime TVv hasn’t got its act togeter yet and given us C7 up this way. Johns’ show I can do without.

#6 
Written By Ray Dixon on February 26th, 2010 @ 7:56 PM

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address